This film employs an impressive technique to blur reality and fiction. The method of narration that delivers the theme ‘God’s will’ and ‘the fate of human beings’ is very extraordinary. The film consists of three major episodes. One episode shows a couple agonizing over the decision to euthanize their newborn baby for his physical disabilities. The second depicts a career woman who was involved in a hit-and-run with a pedestrian on her way home. And the final episode portrays a filmmaker who is overwhelmed with guilt after killing a person by accident at a shooting site. Those positioned in desperate situations learn some advice from friends about God’s will and the fate of human beings, and that advice is the question which the director actually presents to the audience. The most remarkable characteristic in the format is the narration itself. Those three episodes are depicted as movies within a movie, and as the stories of people who are actually involved in making this very film. Therefore, the points of view play a significant role here. This poses the question: whose point of view is in the last episode? The director makes a great choice to present the movie, which leads the audience to a an animation in the end. It turns out that all the stories are made by characters in the animation. This represents the director’s wit which distorts the relationship between God and human beings.(KIM Ji-Seok)